The Future of Macintoshes in Fairfax County
Schools
By Thomas Berens
Washington Apple Pi Journal, reprint
information
Several weeks ago, I heard rumors that the Fairfax County
School System was no longer buying Macintosh computers for
its schools. This school system is, according to its web
site, the 12th largest in the nation. As a taxpayer, I was
concerned as to whether or not this was a wise use of
taxpayers' money. As a Macintosh advocate, I was also
concerned about the impact of this decision on future
Macintosh home purchases throughout the county, since many
parents base their computer purchases on what platforms
their children are using in school. Finally, as a parent of
two boys who are attending these schools, I wondered why the
school system had not made a better effort to inform parents
of this decision.
I brought up this topic at the August General Meeting of
the Pi, and subsequently heard anecdotal evidence that these
rumors were true. Although I volunteered to be a point of
contact for anyone interested in pursuing this issue, I
received no further information from any Pi members with
firsthand knowledge of the situation.
So I decided to go to the source. I posted the following
message on the Fairfax County Public School web site
(www.fcps.k12.va.us):
I heard recently that Fairfax County schools
will no longer be purchasing Macintosh computers. Is this
true? If so, was this announced to the public at all?
Many parents purchase home computers based on which
computers are being used in the schools. Information like
this should be made available to parents well in advance
of classes starting.
I've heard that $1800 computers are being purchased,
when $900 Macintoshes are available which could meet the
same requirements. This seems like a waste of taxpayers
money.
Was some sort of cost-benefits analysis done prior to
making this decision? If so, could it be made available
to the public?
Thank you for your time.
Within a few days, I received the following reply from
Maribeth Luftglass, the Chief Information Officer, FCPS:
Several years ago our school system concluded
that standardizing on a single desktop computer platform
would provide greater benefit to our students in all
grades. Because PCs are the most widely used platform in
colleges and the business world, as well as in all FCPS
high schools, and many elementary schools, it was decided
that FCPS would only purchase PCs as either new or
replacement equipment. At that time, all school system
program managers and principals were made aware of this
decision and were instructed to plan accordingly.
In June 2002, Dr. Domenech further implemented this
decision based on current budget constraints and the
positive impact support of one platform would provide to
the overall school district. This transition to a single
platform will not happen overnight. Both hardware and
software support for the Macintosh will continue for the
life of the Macintosh computers currently in our schools.
We are reviewing our plans and guidelines to assist
schools who choose to make the transition sooner rather
than later. Currently, our educational contract pricing
for our Hewlett Packard PC system configuration is $950
with warranty and maintenance, which is comparable to a
similarly equipped Apple iMac.
Thank you for your interest in Fairfax County Public
Schools. If you have any further questions, please let us
know.
I decided to take her up on her offer to ask further
questions. Below are my follow-up questions and her
replies:
Q. Was a cost-benefit analysis made by the
school system prior to arriving at the conclusion to
standardize? If so, can it be made available to the
public?
A. The Superintendent's decision several years ago to
migrate to a single platform standard was made and
supported by the FCPS Leadership Team (consisting of the
leaders for instructional and administrative departments
within FCPS) based on data supported and accepted by
industry studies concluding that regardless of platform,
standardizing on a single platform benefits an
organization through increased economies of scale and
consolidation of time, effort, and resources required for
key operational components of the support and training
organizations. The RFP and the award made in 1999 for the
Hewlett Packard PC's are public records and available at
the Fairfax County Purchasing and Supply Management
Agency.
Q. Was any effort made to inform the parents of this
plan? Don't you think parents should be informed of this
fact so that they can purchase compatible computers for
home use? At a minimum, shouldn't this be a topic for the
"Back to School" orientations?
A. While our plan and strategy is to migrate to single
platform, with over 65,000 existing computers in our
schools, that vision will take many years. Each school
has a different installed base of hardware. Therefore, we
suggest that parents contact their individual school for
information on their particular technology. Our school
principals are our most valuable resource when
communicating issues of this type to their parent
organizations and communities. We rely on their expertise
for communicating their school specific technology plans
to their constituent communities as they feel is
appropriate.
Q. By continuing hardware support, does that mean that
RAM and/or hard drives will be purchased and replaced in
the Macintoshes as needed? Will current software be
upgraded?
A. Macintosh hardware support will continue on all
models provided that the cost to repair does not exceed
80% of the total replacement value. Specifically, this
would include failed or malfunctioning hardware such as
the type you mention -- hard drives and memory with one
caveat. The schools themselves are responsible for any
memory or hard drive "upgrades." The amount of upgrades
will be contingent on available local school funds.
Macintosh software will continue to be supported
including upgrades provided that schools follow normal
purchasing procedures for ensuring proper licensing.
So there you have it. I won't bother critiquing the CIO's
responses here; most of us have already heard these
arguments and formed our own opinions, so I won't preach to
the choir.
The good news is that the transition will not happen
overnight. The bad news is that it will happen eventually,
unless concerned parents and taxpayers get involved. If you
are interested in helping with this issue, please email me
at tberens@mac.com. If you think that the Pi should become
more involved, then voice your concerns to the Pi officers.
Finally, let your school officials know how you feel about
this.
On the other hand, if you are a parent and you agree with
the CIO's comments, then I suggest you start budgeting for a
home PC.
Don't say you weren't warned.
|